Guest blogger Tom Perkins

OF PULPITS, PUNDITS, & PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

In obtaining a graduate degree as a counselor, our state requires a basic pharmacology course. It provides a working knowledge of brain chemistry, its functions, and how drugs, prescription or illegal, affect the body. The intricate interplay of chemistry, electrical impulses, and brain tissue is a wonder to behold. Understanding the microscopic choreography of neurotransmitters, neurons, dendrites, the synaptic gap, and re-uptake ports is undeniable evidence of a Greater Source at work.

Ten years ago, within a couple weeks of each other, my boss and my family physician delicately asked if I would be willing to try an antidepressant. If they asked that question ten or even five years earlier, I would have brushed them off. My wife has had a lifelong struggle with an Obsessive Compulsion Disorder. A year before I tried an antidepressant she took Paxil, a medication that works well with those struggling with OCD. About six weeks into her medication she looked up at me one morning and said, “So, this is what normal people feel like?” I could not agree more. The change in her was dramatic. I realize that is not true in every case, but for her, it was a miracle.

I make my living meeting one-on-one with people. Sometimes it’s in a small group. For several years, I found it increasingly difficult to meet with people. I am an off-the-charts extrovert. Struggling to meet with people is not something I ever encountered. Even more discouraging was my unwillingness to answer the phone. In fact, when it rang a deep sense of dread came over me. Days would go by before I had enough emotional energy to pick up the phone and get my messages. Not surprisingly, some messages were terse for not calling back or even answering the phone. That would make it even more difficult to call them back. Hindsight, of course, is twenty-twenty. I can now see what an incredible funk I was in. “Funk”, as in clinical depression. You literally could not see the surface of my desk. I would do just enough administrative paperwork to keep myself out of trouble. I was simply hanging on.

Although the science of brain chemistry is still quite new (1950’s +) and knowledge about the workings of some neurotransmitters (dopamine, serotonin, norepinephrine) incomplete, researchers are beginning to understand that our emotions are regulated through those “Big Three”. Specific chemistry is released when experiencing specific emotions. Probably the most commonly known neurotransmitter is adrenalin. Working late one night you stop at the grocery store to pick up a few items for dinner. While putting groceries in the trunk of your car you hear footsteps quickly approaching you. When confronted with a perceived threat, adrenalin is dumped into your bloodstream via the sympathetic nervous system and the adrenal cortex. Your brain computer races through a series of options and, depending on the threat, you initiate a “fight or flight” response. That’s just one chemical initiating one emotional response.

Scientists have discovered that the neurotransmitters that engage our emotions can be depleted. In some cases they are never restored. In addition to alcohol, there are three other major transgressors in chemical depletion: illegal drugs, age, and trauma. Here is a micro-synopsis of that process:

- Alcohol and illegal drugs mimic and then hijack neurotransmitters. Like pouring gas on a bonfire, ecstasy, cocaine, meth and the like flood our brain giving our emotions an exponential rush. This is followed by a “crash” or depression and loss of neurotransmitters – some permanently.

The aging process causes our external bodies to break down and our internal organs follow the same path. As bones, thyroid, and our metabolism are depleted through time, so brain chemistry is no exception.

- Trauma and its relationship to neurotransmitter depletion are gaining much attention. Scientists are beginning to understand that ongoing trauma in a person’s life contributes to the stripping of our emotional stability. That is, the big three neurotransmitters (dopamine, serotonin, noreprinephrine, and a host of others) that give us balance and perspective become depleted. The more ongoing and severe the trauma, the faster the imbalance occurs.  Childhood abuse, occupational stress, combat, divorce, rage, rape, hatred, and bitterness all contribute to a loss of emotional stability.

When doctors recommend a prescription drug to restructure emotional balance they are attempting to create a fairly exact replication of the neurotransmitters that are lacking in some patients. Like adding motor oil to an engine or taking vitamin B12 for the body, so “brain drugs” replenish what has gone missing.

And we need to know this because…?

It is most discouraging in the counseling community to hear a church leader, parachurch leader, or well-meaning Christian state that mood-stabilizing prescription drugs are not what God intends for us. This can be followed by “The Bible and the Holy Spirit are more than sufficient in healing those with troubled minds.” The collateral damage done by those statements can be tragic. What unwise counsel we give others in the name of Christ. Flippant clichés and cost-me-nothing quotes can have devastating results. Those thoughtless, un-researched remarks, given to those who are struggling deeply with depression or mental illness, may result in the taking of their life or the life of someone else. Exaggeration? Sadly no. The documentation of this is damning to the Christian community.

Except for a few cults, no one counsels his or her friend to stop taking insulin and trust God. There are some people born into this world with a lack of insulin. There are some people born into this world whose bodies stop producing insulin later in life. Do we condemn these folks? Do we ever tell them that all they need is the Bible and Jesus? There are some people in prison today for offering that sage counsel.

Why is it so difficult for us in the body of Christ to wrap our heads around the possibility that some folks are born with fewer neurotransmitters than others? Why is it so difficult for us to believe that some people lose those chemicals later in life? What is so threatening for a pastor or lay leader to acknowledge that prescription medicine can heal a hurting brain? Possibly, it is a lack of understanding regarding our physiology and specifically the interplay of our brain and emotions. Even the phrase “chemical imbalance” conjures up all kinds of mumbo jumbo and rationalizations for not “poisoning” the brain.

The sad irony of it all is that the person who most needs medicine to balance out-of-control emotions steadfastly refuses to take any pill that would cause them to “lose control.” It bears repeating. The solution that would bring harmony (control) into that individual’s life (and those around them!) and thereby give them mastery of their emotions is instead seen as a terrifying entity – as if he or she would no longer have control. This could well be the enemy’s doing – a stronghold keeping believers in bondage to their fears. The second saddest irony is that pastors unknowingly can be in collusion with the very enemy that is attacking their flock.

We hear very little from the pulpit and in Christian journals talking about psychoactive drugs. Even hearing the pros and cons of “brain medicine” would be a great start. It is important to state that chemical replenishment is not a silver bullet. Much is still to be known about psychoactive drugs and how they help an individual lead a productive and normal life.  Sometimes it takes weeks, even months, to get the right dosage. It’s like tuning an engine or deciding what grade of gasoline and oil is best for that engine. Finding the right mixture can be a process. But once the correct prescription is identified, the results can be stunning. For many, these medicines have provided true emotional freedom and the ability to think and act responsibly after years of deep discouragement and hopelessness.

Tom Perkins is a staff representative for the Navigators,  an international, interdenominational Christian ministry established in 1933.  He lives with his wife Ann in Virginia.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Christianity

Temper of the Times: Crisis Mentality

It has gotten to the point where I almost get nauseous reading news or watching it on TV. I believe the reason for this is the constant crises portrayed there.  But who can blame the purveyors of so-called truth on the cable networks or online?

Many of the folks in the media or just lapping up what they receive from our politicians. The current presidential administration in America has become expert in keeping the populace in a permanent state of fever. It is almost a cliche now that President Obama is in constant campaign mode instead of governing.

The Republican opposition is no better.  The members of Congress respond to Mr. Obama by doing their own grandstanding. Rand Paul’s recent filibuster is an example of this partisan play for media attention.

I am a believer in Jesus Christ. Because of this I sometime watch Christian programming on television. What I find there is almost as upsetting as the political garbage spewing out on CNN or Fox News.

Many believers think we are in the end times. This means to the Christian that Jesus Christ will return to Earth soon to set up His kingdom. I won’t get into all the eschatologicial viewpoints on how this is to transpire here.

However, the key point is that religion also keeps us on edge these days. In the last few months we have been fed the potential of cataclysmic disaster because of what earlier prophets have written or interpreted.

At the close of 2012 many were focused on what the Mayan calendar was supposed to predict. None of this came  to pass.

In the  run up to the election of a new Pope, we were told of  the prophecies of an Irish saint by the name of Malachy. He had foretold that this particular papacy was to usher in the end times.

One test of a prophet is that his predictions come true. My guess is that Malachy was all wet inasmuch as this Pope was to be called Peter the Roman according to him.

Jose Mario Bergoglio, the new Pope,   is Argentine. I can’t see where the name Peter could be drawn from his name.

He is the son of Italian immigrants, but it seems to me that associating the former cardinal with Rome is possible. Furthermore, he took the name Francis out of respect for the saint who ministered to the poor, not the name of the apostle who is credited with founding the Roman church.

This period of time reminds me of the spirit that was present at the  time of the new millenium. Everyone was all atwitter (and I don’t mean that they were on the social media vehicle–it didn’t exist in 1999) over what was called Y2K.

What was supposed to occur was a complete meltdown of our infrastructure.  Our computers, for example , were not supposed to handle the changeover to the new numbers.

Thus, you had people in places like Upstate South Carolina hoarding goods in anticipation of chaos. When the new century presented itself, nothing happened. It was business as usual on January 1.

In all fairness, I tended to believe and support the prophets of doom at that time. I recall one of them getting mocked and abused on a Charlotte radio station. Afterwards I sent him an Email in support.

In retrospect I should have never sent that message. He deserved the flogging.

I now see him as a charlatan. There are a lot of them running around today. Forgive me my skepticism when I hear another politico or media person tell us that the sky is falling.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Super Bowl 2013: A Ravens “Festivus Maximus”

I have watched a lot of ESPN this week.  The network is loaded with former NFL players and coaches who are yakking about this week’s Super Bowl.

The most intriguing discussion so far has been one I watched with Brian Billick, the former Baltimore Ravens coach. He was their head man when they won the Super Bowl in 2000.

Back then, the Ravens referred to the Super Bowl as “Festivus Maximus”.  Billick had refused to allow to let his team use the word “playoffs” during  December. As a result,  the players borrowed the term “Festivus” (with origins in the Seinfeld sitcom) to refer to them.

Billick was asked by his interrogator who he liked in the Big Game. His response was basically “pick ‘em”.  Despite his interviewer’s attempts to corner him into a choice, Billick held his ground.

I found this rather surprising since I figured the former Ravens coach would pick his former team. When does Jimmy Johnson, for instance, pick against the Cowboys?

What this told me was that Billick may be experiencing the same emotions  I am as the game approaches.  Like me,  he may be thinking but not willing to publicly admit that the San Francisco 49ers are the better team.

Today the ESPN talking heads were marveling over the network’s interviews of current NFC players, all who are picking the AFC Champion Ravens. After some discussion, the pundits determined that their choice of Baltimore to win had to have something to do with the Ray Lewis factor.

Lewis is widely admired in the NFL and he has said that this is his “last ride”.  An out-of-the blue and to me annoying claim this week that he may have used something called Deer Antlers, a banned substance, to aid his recovery from a torn triceps this season has done little to tarnish the man’s image as Sunday approaches.

Billick’s failure to choose a winner also may have something to do with this truth: the team’s are very evenly matched.  Even Ravens coach John Harbaugh says his team and the 49ers are mirror images, which is no surprise since if you aimed a looking glass at the 49ers sideline you would get a reflection of his brother Coach Jim standing there.

As with my league championship predictions, I really have no idea who is going to win. Even with my understanding that I have no true prophetic ability, I won’t keep me from trying.

Furthermore, I must now gloat and point to my correct prognostications.  Against most of the pundits, I picked Balmer to make the Super Bowl.  I also chose the 49ers to make it.

The truth is, as a Baltimoron I badly want to see a Ravens win. My hometown is so starved for a champion that it would be a big boon to the place.  I do realize in saying that, however, that people who claim places like San Diego and Seattle as their home have similar feelings. Too bad.

I have been disappointed in the outcome of matches in which I had a huge emotional investment before.  The biggest sporting letdown of my life (other than the Baltimore Colts loss to Joe Namath’s Jets in Super Bowl III, which would probably be number once except that I was too young to understand the game’s meaning) was the result of the 1979 World Series.

In this event, I watched hopelessly as the Pittsburgh Pirates won Game 7. I knew by the 7th inning it was over, as the Pirates submariner Kent Teckulve was unhittable.

The Orioles blew a 4-1 series lead. I remember being distraught in the last part of the last game. Afterwards, I vowed never to get so emotionally involved with a sports team again, and I haven’t.

Which doesn’t mean I won’t be pulling for the Ravens. Here’s my prediction of how things will pan out.

The Game

Joe Flacco opens the Super Bowl with a long bomb touchdown to Maryland’s  Torrey Smith on the first play and the Ravens go up 7-0.  The first quarter ends with that score. Colin “Legs” Kaepernick is tackled by Ed Reed after a 30-yard run in the middle of the  second quarter and suffers a concussion, making his continuance unwise.

In comes Alex Smith, who unjustly lost his starting job to Kaepernick after he himself was concussed during the season.  The half ends with the 49ers defense standing strong, knowing that their backs are against the wall. Halftime score 7-0.

In the third quarter, the 49ers defense continues to play well, sacking Joe Flacco several times. Aldon Smith smacks the ball out of Flacco’s hand at the Ravens 20, picks up the ball and runs it into the end zone. In a horribly boring Super Bowl at this point, the third quarter ends 7-7 and I am hoping somebody in my family is going to order pizza.

However, the teams come out in the fourth quarter playing with a vengeance. Both defenses are tired after  fending off relentless rushing from Frank Gore and Ray Rice all game.

In the first series, Flacco finds Torrey Smith for another long score .  No to be denied Alex Smith dinks and dunks the 49ers down the field and finally  lobs the ball into Vernon Davis’s (like Smith, a Terrapin) hands for an equalizing touchdown with two minutes to go. With Jim Caldwell calling run after run to Rice and Bernard Pierce, the clock runs out and the Super Bowl goes into overtime.

The 49ers win the toss and march down the field with their former field general in charge. In comes the fragile David Akers to attempt a 42 yard field goal. As expected, he misses.

The Ravens take over. With the 49ers front seven coming with an all-out blitz in a last gasp effort to get to The Streaky One, Flacco dumps a screen pass to Ray Rice.

As he has done in the past (think 4th and 29 this season), Rice speeds down the field and is angled out of bounds by a 49ers defender.

The Ravens season ended last year in the AFC Championship game with Billy Cundiff missing a 32-yard field goal with 11 seconds left. In a piece of divine justice, his replacement Justin Tucker boots a similar 32 yarder and Ray Lewis is seen lying prostrate in glory as the ball sails straight through the uprights.

Lewis and the  Ravens garner their second Lombardi Trophy, which is no big surprise. However, what is  a stunning development in this day and age of wide-open offensive football is the final score:

Ravens 17 49ers 14.

There is just no way I can pick against a team from Baltimore in a big game. My head says San Fran, but my heart says Charm City.

 

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

2013 NFL Conference Championships: Birds, Brady or Har-bowl?

I went out on a limb last week, picking the underdog in all cases. Technically Atlanta was not an underdog, but they might as well have been. I managed to get 50% of the results right.

The reality is  I could have gone 0-4. If it hadn’t been for last second great plays and screw ups, I would have.

What can we learn from last week?  One thing we can garner is that if a team keeps the game close until the end, they have a shot.

Both Atlanta and Baltimore looked done. However, two Atlanta “Matts” and Tony Gonzalez saved the Falcons in the end. In addition, Broncos mistakes and Ravens heroics gained Baltimore a win in two overtimes.

This prognostication business is not an exact science. This is because in the game of football you are dealing with human glory and foibles.

Who could have guessed streaky Joe Flacco would have hit on a Hail Mary? Would any of us have bet that Peyton Manning would throw a costly interception in the final minutes that would result in the Ravens moving on?

As I view this week’s conference championship games, I am tempted to walk away. I could go either way. However, I will make an attempt here.

I keep hearing the term “storylines” from the sports pundits. They say that there are a lot of them. One is that the Ravens are feeding on the emotion of this being the last run for linebacker Ray Lewis.

However, there are other just as glaring stories out there. Tom Brady wants to match the four Super Bowl victories of his hero Joe Montana, for instance.

(The 49ers connection in these playoffs blow my mind by the way. In addition to the aformentioned Montana link, there is the desire of Adrian Rogers and Colin Kaepernick both wanting to play for San Francisco as kids.)

Furthermore, Atlanta is looking to win its first Super Bowl. Yesterday I read an article in Sports Illustrated written by an Atlanta-based writer concerning the thrills and trials of being a Falcons fan over the years.

He mentioned that his experience was nothing special, though. The author noted that there were fans in places like Chicago (Cubs) with similar youths.

One interesting tidbit I learned from reading his piece is once again related to the 49ers. I have no idea if the the rivalry still continues, but apparently Atlanta and San Francisco used to be archenemies.

Does all this karma about San Francisco make them a team of destiny? I doubt it. Baltimore, Atlanta and New England could all make that claim for the reasons I stated above.

One interesting issue I see in these conference championships is the types of quarterbacks left standing.

Like Seattle, San Francisco adapted their offense over time to the pistol used by the Redskins with Robert Griffin III. Thus, last week we had their quarterback running amok and setting an all-time record for rushing in an NFL game.

Tom Brady, Joe Flacco and Matt Ryan are all drop back passers. What does this tell us about the type of offense that is most effective in the NFL?

Right now Mike Nolan, the Atlanta defensive coordinator, is probably looking at old film of Darrel Royal’s Texas Longhorns.  Defensive coaches will spend all winter and spring trying to figure out how to stop what was once a college offense. Although they have something of an idea (assign a man to each potential ball carrier says Bill Parcells) they’re players don’t seem to be able to change from the pro style of defense.

Within there is this nagging suspicion that at least one of these games will include some play where the miraculous happens. I took a look at “The Immaculate Reception” on YouTube yesterday and read about it on Wikipedia.

This kind of extraordinary event could very well decide a close game. Define “close game” I tell myself. In modern football, 20 point leads aren’t safe anymore, which was attested to by the Seahawks comeback last week.

Then there is the “don’t touch me” aspect of  the NFL in 2013. In this day and age of wide-open offenses and wimpy officiating, Jack Tatum would have been called for a personal foul on the hit he gave “Frenchy” Fuqua in the Steelers-Raiders match in 1972. It would have been declined, however, as Franco Harris scooped the ball up and  ran into legend.

In any event, my gut is telling me there is going to be an Immaculate something in one of these games.

So, with all these issues on the table, as one popular commercial states,”Here we go!”:

NFC San Francisco at Atlanta

My vague memories of conference championships past (usually with the Washington Redskins playing) conjure up images of iron curtain defenses and brutal hitting. If any team left in this weekend’s foursome can produce that kind of game, it is the 49ers.  If one of my teams were up against them, I would be afraid. Very afraid.

Atlanta on the other hand has a lot of dangerous weapons. Every time I watch them Tony Gonzalez straddles the end line of the end zone and catches a pass from Matt Ryan for a touchdown.

Combined with their defense and the fact that I think they want to avenge last year’s loss in the same game, I have to go with San Fran. Now that Atlanta has the “can’t win a playoff game” monkey off their back, I don’t think they’ll have the same intensity.

Prediction: San Francisco 49ers  42 Atlanta 28

AFC Baltimore at New England

When I think of this game, the image that pops up in front of me is Tom Brady. He is no doubt the best QB in the game.

He and Joe Flacco have one thing in common. They can both throw the deep ball.

The once maligned Bill Belichik is now one of the greatest coaches ever. One of the little things that he does every off season is bring on someone else’s malcontent.

This year’s bad boy is cornerback Aqib Talib. He could play the way Champ Bailey was supposed to for the Broncos last week and negate the deep ball.

The Ravens defense is overrated. They are living on their past laurels.

However, if they have one leg up it is that their current defensive coordinator Dean Pees  used to hold the same position for the Patriots (2004-2009).  He might be able to give Balmer an edge since he knows Billy B and Tommy Brady’s tendencies.

I am worried as a Baltimoron, however, that Ray Lewis and fellow future Hall of Famer Ed Reed have lost not just a step, but a leap. Ray looked slow against the Broncos and Reed disappeared.

Having said all this, there is no one better than the Ravens to match up with the Patriots. Baltimore players aren’t  intimidated by the Yankees from NE, probably because they have had the same experience I have had: being lost in the middle of the night driving in downtown Baltimore and ending up on Light Street. (Think HBO’s “The Wire”). Nothing will scare you after that.

Also in the Ravens’ minds will be last season’s debacle ending in the same matchup. Lee Evans drop in the end zone and Billy Cundiff’s botched field goal cost them a shot against the New York Football Giants in the Super Bowl.

Finally, the Ravens  went into New England two years ago and plowed the Patriots in the playoffs.  They can do it again, but I don’t think it will be a blowout.

It’ll be more like the game in New England won by a point by Balmer earlier this season.   In a fitting result, the Ravens will gain a razor’s edge win in Gillette stadium. Most likely, there will be due to some divine intervention.

Prediction: Ravens 37  Patriots 34

Yes. We’ll have ourselves a Super Har-bowl!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

2013 NFL Divisional Playoffs: Ya gotta have heart

I picked three of the four wild card games correctly last weekend. Unfortunately, my “miss” involved my beloved Washington Redskins, who lost to Seattle in a controversial game in which their franchise quarterback either stayed or was left in too long by his coach and suffered a potentially career hampering injury. That situation warrants a post of its own, but I will leave that one to the professional pundits.

Perhaps this has left me in a risk taking mood of my own. As you will see, my choices for this week probably won’t get a lot of support. But, hey, what do I have to lose. I’m not putting any money on these matches. Just follow my reasoning (or lack thereof!).

AFC

Baltimore at Denver

I wouldn’t root for the Broncos if they were run by Pope John II.  They ARE managed by John Elway, who dissed the old Baltimore franchise by refusing to play in my hometown. Bum.

In any case, the going theory is that Peyton Manning is unstoppable and the Broncos are on a long winning streak. As I noted last week, however, the Ravens are on a crusade of their own. It’s the swan song for Ray Lewis and potentially Ed Reed, too. Furthermore, Joe Flacco (“Flakoo” in Baltimorese) has a lot to prove. He was one dropped/stripped pass from a Super Bowl appearance last year.

Both Joe F. and the Ravens defense (including the suddenly dominant Paul Kruger) will use their emotion and underdog status to pull the upset.

Prediction: Ravens 24 Broncos 20

Houston at New England

Like the Ravens, the Texans were crushed by this weekend’s opponent during the regular season. Who cares? This is the playoffs. Just win baby (in the words of AL Davis). In another contest decided by emotion, the Texans will run Arian Foster left and Arian Foster right and Arian Foster up the middle and keep the ball away from Tom Brady. The Patriots, for whom a Super Bowl contest is old hat, will come out flat. Matt Schaub will find Andre Johnson enough to make a difference. Both the quarterback and his Hall of Fame receiver will be playing with a chip on their shoulders. I would be remiss if I abandoned a Houston team I chose to win the Super Bowl last summer here in January. When they’re on, I still think they are the best overall team in the game.

Prediction:: Texans 27  Patriots 24

NFC

Seattle at Atlanta

The gamblers appear to be favoring the Falcons, but most of the professional talking heads seem to be saying that the streaking Seahawks will win. The reasoning is that Atlanta is a soft team that plays well during the season, but folds during the playoffs. Some are even picking Hollywood Peter Carroll’s brutes for the Super Bowl.

I admit as a Redskin fan that there is no love lost between me and the ‘Hawks. Trash talking Richard Sherman needs to watch his back the next time his team plays Washington. He didn’t just go after other players, he dissed ole Mike Shanahan, ar0using the ire of Trent Williams, who tried to mash his face in. Sherman’s response was not even juvenile. Try maybe nine-ish.

I just think Atlanta, like the other put upon teams in this tournament, will rise to the occasion over the slights they are given by the media. They have a team of talented veterans and they are playing at home. Then, there is the west to east travel thing, which the Seahawks deny has an impact. But it probably does.

Prediction: Atlanta 32 Seattle 17

Green Bay at San Francisco

This is a tough one. But I think it will all come down to quarterback play. Aaron Rodgers is considered to be the best QB in football and Colin what’s-his-name, while possessing some positive attributes, is a rook.  The 49ers’ defense will keep them in the game, as will Frank Gore.  I think the Packers will also want to avenge the loss they incurred at Lambeau against San Francisco earlier in the season.  The latter came within a hair of playing in last year’s big game and they’ll want to atone for that loss. However, I think Green Bay believes they are the NFC’s version of the Patriots and belong in the Super Bowl every year. They’ll be out to prove it.

Prediction Green Bay 30 San Francisco 20

My prognostications set up the following scenario for the entrance games into the Big Show.

Baltimore at Houston

Green Bay at Atlanta

As my policy this year is to not predict ahead, I will wait until next week to make the picks for teams involved in these games.

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

DVD review: The Artist

As a man sliding down the far side of middle age I can relate to the struggles of George Valentin, an aging silent film star portrayed in the 2011 hit movie “The Artist”.  Like many older men,  Valentin is faced with the sudden and surprisingly life-changing effects of technology.

He is an icon of the film industry in the late 1920s. The world is his oyster. Then, the studios decide to start making “talkies”.

Valentin doesn’t take the new genre seriously. He thinks “talkies” are a passing fancy.

What he thinks doesn’t matter, though. His bosses rightly believe that sound pictures are the wave of the future and Valentin is out of a job.

For Valentin, the solution is to produce his own film with him as the star. However, it bombs completely.

His movie loses out big time at the box office to the “talkie” starring a young former female protege of his.  Peppy Miller is charismatic and beautiful and is now the “cat’s meow”.

If you are older and less captivating than the competition in your workplace, you can surely relate to Valentin’s dilemma with Peppy. While he too is energized by her allure, he finds that she is indeed stealing his thunder.

I once was a trainer in a corporation. I wasn’t aged then, but I was at least 10 years older the female colleague I taught a course with once.

A fellow female trainer pulled me over after the course. She told me that this girl had lit up the room while I had…well, you can guess.

This self-appointed guru suggested in so many words that I was in the wrong line of work. I was humble about it outwardly, but inside I was seething.

“The Artist” does an excellent job of revealing the impact of becoming  a has been and nobody.  This is a common malady of the soon-to-be senior citizen of any generation.

Twenty  some years after my corporate training debacle, I find myself facing unemployment like Mr. V in this flick.  I have had three major interviews this autumn in which my credentials seemed to shine. However, I get the impression, having not been offered any of the positions, that the employer deemed me to be a worn out old fossil.

Valentin becomes depressed over his economic, social and relational losses. Despite the efforts of his former chauffeur and, increasingly,  the now famous Peppy Miller, Valentin sinks further into a sinkhole. (Interestingly enough, this state is foreshadowed in a scene from his own silent movie production in which he disappears into quicksand!)

Just in the nick of time, when all seems lost for Valentin, his devoted Peppy comes to the rescue. She figures out how to resurrect George’s career.

“The Artist” has a lot going for it. The movie itself is filmed in an anachronistic way, with lots of silence and in black and white.

Furthermore, Berenice Bejo is aptly cast as the enchanting Peppy Miller. In comparison to the rather droll Jean Dujardin, who portrayed Valentin, she stands out.

Of course, I believe the film’s producers intended this contrast. Considering  that Durjardin is only four years Bejo’s senior, the makeup people of “The Artist” probably also deserve some kudos!

Dog lovers will appreciate the faithful friend status of Valentin’s Jack Russell terrier. The canine star Uggie, himself rescued from a dog pound in real life, literally saves Valentin.

One down note in “The Artist” is the casual way it treats the relationship between Valentin and Miller. While it is not clear if there is a physical relationship between the two, there definitely is an emotional affair going on.

Valentin is  married and the sparks between him and Peppy contribute to the death of his marriage. Of course, the silent actor’s reversal of fortunes didn’t help either.

If you are a person of faith like me, the apathy with which the script deals with this dalliance may offend you. Otherwise, you’ll find “The Artist” to be a worthy and quality film.

For me, that there is a solution to Valentin’s dilemma with technology and ageism was inspiring.  I admit to being something of a Ludite these days, so anything that motivates me to keep staying ahead of the young whippersnappers with their impossible to use I phones is a winner to me.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

2013 NFL Wildcard Weekend Picks

The 2013 NFL playoffs are upon us. So it’s time for me to make my annual predictions.

In the summer I forecasted a return of the New York Giants to the Super Bowl. That prognostication fell flat, as the men of Gotham didn’t even make the playoffs.

But my AFC pick to make the Big Show, the Houston Texans, are still in it. Unfortunately, they floundered at season’s end and lost their number one seeding. Now they have to host a game on the opening weekend.

I will make my picks in rather unorthodox fashion. First, I will explain what I would like to see happen in my heart. Then I will tell you what my head is telling me. Then I will choose a winner.

AFC

Cincinnatti Bengals at Houston Texans

Heart

As my pick to win the Super Bowl, my pride tells me that I want the Texans to go all the way.

Head

I don’t think Matt Schaub has the wherewithal to lead Houston to the Bowl. However, the Bengals, though improving, are not ready for prime time.

Winner: Houston Texans

Indianapolis Colts at Baltimore Ravens

Heart

This game has a lot of emotion for me. The Bolts (usually a name reserved for the Chargers, but I call them that because they “bolted” my hometown of Baltimore) are my sworn enemy for taking away my childhood loyalties. Yet, their coach Chuck Pagano, a former Ravens defensive coordinator, has battled luekemia (a disease I am personally familiar with) successfully and led Indy with his “Chuckstrong” inspiration.

I root for the Ravens because they represent my birthplace, but sometimes I see them as the old Cleveland Browns, the original franchise. The Pagano effect has been countered with the announcement of Ray Lewis’s retirement. Lewis, arguably the greatest defensive player ever, has the same iconic impact in Baltimore today that Johnny Unitas did when I was a boy.

So, I want to see the Ravens win in my soul.

Head

Like the Bengals, the Colts are not ready for prime time. They are close, and Andrew Luck will threaten the Ravens success. Yet, the Ravens are still smarting over the Lee Evans “dropped” pass that kept them out of last year’s Super Bowl. This anger and Ray’s retirement will push them to  victory.

Winner: Baltimore Ravens

NFC

Minnesota Vikings at Green Bay Packers

Heart

I have grown to like Adrian Peterson this year. The man has a lot of heart. In fact, I think he is the MVP of the league.  So I would like to see the Vikes knock off the Pack. The latter were also a childhood foe of the Balmer Colts, although I hold no ill will for them today.

Head

It took everything they had and the best effort from Christian Ponder for the Vikings to beat Green Bay in Minnesota last week and make the playoffs.  I just don’t think they have it in them to do it again in Green Bay.

Winner: Green Bay Packers

Seattle Seahawks at Washington Redskins

Heart

The Redskins became my favorite team when the Colts left Baltimore. I have lived (and mostly died) with them since. Thus, I am of course rooting for them. Like any other Skins fan, I love RG3 and Albert Morris. For once, my NFL playoff season doesn’t consist of rooting against a list of enemies.

Head

The Seahawks are the conventional choice. They have their own rookie QB who is lighting up the league. Supposedly, they have a better defense.

However, the Hawks haven’t played that well on the road this year. Furthermore, I think Jim Haslett has done some great moves with his defense this year and will somehow confound the Seattle offense.

Winner: Washington Redskins

Next week I will see how I did and make predictions for the second round.

GO SKINS!

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized